Interviewer Observations

This page contains tables that summarize interviewer observations data for the DETECT F/U Interviews participants. Data for all follow-up visits is included even if a participant was visited more than once.

Tables

Categorical Variables

abandonment_statement_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Abandonment Indicators: Statement by older adults regarding abandonment. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

abandonment_statement_f

No evidence

191

97.9 (94.6 - 99.2)

abandonment_statement_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

abandonment_statement_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

abandonment_statement_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

abandonment_statement_f

Unable to assess

4

2.1 (0.8 - 5.4)

abuse_statement_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Abuse Indicators: Statement by older adult related to abuse. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

abuse_statement_f

No evidence

200

97.1 (93.6 - 98.7)

abuse_statement_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

abuse_statement_f

Probable evidence

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.4)

abuse_statement_f

Definite evidence

3

1.5 (0.5 - 4.5)

abuse_statement_f

Unable to assess

2

1.0 (0.2 - 3.8)

aps_reported_f

No longer used - In the original observational measures, it would indicate if the medic submitted an APS report.

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

aps_reported_f

No

194

98.5 (95.3 - 99.5)

aps_reported_f

Yes

3

1.5 (0.5 - 4.7)

aps_reported_method_f

No longer used - In the original observational measures, it would indicate the method through which the medic submitted the APS report (Phone, Online, Other).

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

aps_reported_method_f

Other

1

33.3 (0.1 - 99.7)

aps_reported_method_f

Phone

2

66.7 (0.3 - 99.9)

at_abandon_4cat_f

AT_5. Do you believe abandonment has occurred?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

at_abandon_4cat_f

Yes

3

0.5 (0.1 - 1.4)

at_abandon_4cat_f

No

641

99.5 (98.6 - 99.9)

at_abandon_4cat_f

Don't know

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

at_abandon_4cat_f

Refused

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

at_emotional_4cat_f

AT_3. Do you believe emotional or psychological abuse has occurred?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

at_emotional_4cat_f

Yes

20

3.1 (2.0 - 4.7)

at_emotional_4cat_f

No

622

96.1 (94.3 - 97.4)

at_emotional_4cat_f

Don't know

5

0.8 (0.3 - 1.8)

at_emotional_4cat_f

Refused

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

at_financial_4cat_f

AT_6. Do you believe financial or material exploitation has occurred?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

at_financial_4cat_f

Yes

8

1.2 (0.6 - 2.5)

at_financial_4cat_f

No

636

98.5 (97.1 - 99.2)

at_financial_4cat_f

Don't know

2

0.3 (0.1 - 1.2)

at_financial_4cat_f

Refused

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

at_neglect_4cat_f

AT_4. Do you believe neglect has occurred?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

at_neglect_4cat_f

Yes

7

1.1 (0.5 - 2.3)

at_neglect_4cat_f

No

639

98.6 (97.3 - 99.3)

at_neglect_4cat_f

Don't know

2

0.3 (0.1 - 1.2)

at_neglect_4cat_f

Refused

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

at_physical_4cat_f

AT_1. Do you believe physical abuse has occurred?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

at_physical_4cat_f

Yes

9

1.4 (0.7 - 2.6)

at_physical_4cat_f

No

639

98.5 (97.2 - 99.2)

at_physical_4cat_f

Don't know

1

0.2 (0.0 - 1.1)

at_physical_4cat_f

Refused

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

at_self_4cat_f

AT_7. Do you believe self-neglect has occurred?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

at_self_4cat_f

Yes

13

2.0 (1.2 - 3.4)

at_self_4cat_f

No

637

97.7 (96.2 - 98.6)

at_self_4cat_f

Don't know

2

0.3 (0.1 - 1.2)

at_self_4cat_f

Refused

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

at_sexual_4cat_f

AT_2. Do you believe sexual abuse has occurred?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

at_sexual_4cat_f

Yes

9

1.4 (0.7 - 2.7)

at_sexual_4cat_f

No

634

98.1 (96.8 - 98.9)

at_sexual_4cat_f

Don't know

2

0.3 (0.1 - 1.2)

at_sexual_4cat_f

Refused

1

0.2 (0.0 - 1.1)

bathroom_cleanliness_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Cleanliness - Bathroom. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

bathroom_cleanliness_5cat_f

0 - Clean, no evidence of unsanitary conditions

126

79.2 (72.2 - 84.9)

bathroom_cleanliness_5cat_f

1

19

11.9 (7.7 - 18.1)

bathroom_cleanliness_5cat_f

2

7

4.4 (2.1 - 9.0)

bathroom_cleanliness_5cat_f

3

7

4.4 (2.1 - 9.0)

bathroom_cleanliness_5cat_f

4 - Very dirty, unwashed dishes, trash litter

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

bedroom_cleanliness_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Cleanliness - Bedroom. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

bedroom_cleanliness_5cat_f

0 - Clean, no evidence of unsanitary conditions

124

68.9 (61.7 - 75.3)

bedroom_cleanliness_5cat_f

1

36

20.0 (14.7 - 26.6)

bedroom_cleanliness_5cat_f

2

12

6.7 (3.8 - 11.4)

bedroom_cleanliness_5cat_f

3

7

3.9 (1.9 - 8.0)

bedroom_cleanliness_5cat_f

4 - Very dirty, unwashed dishes, trash litter

1

0.6 (0.1 - 3.9)

bruising_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Abuse Indicators: Bruising. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

bruising_f

No evidence

200

98.5 (95.5 - 99.5)

bruising_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

bruising_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

bruising_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

bruising_f

Unable to assess

3

1.5 (0.5 - 4.5)

c_detect_status_f

Calculation indicating if the DETECT screener was positive or negative.

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

c_detect_status_f

Negative

785

90.6 (88.5 - 92.4)

c_detect_status_f

Positive

81

9.4 (7.6 - 11.5)

caregiver_anxious_f

Detection of Elder abuse Through Emergency Care Technicians (DETECT) Screening Items: If caregiver(s) present, they appear overly concerned (e.g., anxious, hovering).

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

caregiver_anxious_f

Yes

3

0.3 (0.1 - 1.1)

caregiver_anxious_f

No

396

46.0 (42.7 - 49.4)

caregiver_anxious_f

No caregiver present

461

53.6 (50.3 - 56.9)

caregiver_anxious_f

Unable to assess

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

caregiver_anxious_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

caregiver_frustrated_f

Detection of Elder abuse Through Emergency Care Technicians (DETECT) Screening Items: If caregiver(s) present, they appear frustrated, tired, angry or burdened by the patient/older adult.

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

caregiver_frustrated_f

Yes

5

0.6 (0.2 - 1.4)

caregiver_frustrated_f

No

391

45.4 (42.1 - 48.8)

caregiver_frustrated_f

No caregiver present

465

54.0 (50.7 - 57.3)

caregiver_frustrated_f

Unable to assess

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

caregiver_frustrated_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

caregiver_lack_knowledge_f

Detection of Elder abuse Through Emergency Care Technicians (DETECT) Screening Items: If caregiver present, they appear to lack knowledge of the patient/older adult’s medical needs.

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

caregiver_lack_knowledge_f

Yes

5

0.6 (0.2 - 1.4)

caregiver_lack_knowledge_f

No

396

45.9 (42.6 - 49.2)

caregiver_lack_knowledge_f

No caregiver present

462

53.5 (50.2 - 56.8)

caregiver_lack_knowledge_f

Unable to assess

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

caregiver_lack_knowledge_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

caregiver_unengaged_f

Detection of Elder abuse Through Emergency Care Technicians (DETECT) Screening Items: If caregiver(s) present, they appear unengaged an inattentive in caring for the patient/older adult.

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

caregiver_unengaged_f

Yes

7

0.8 (0.4 - 1.7)

caregiver_unengaged_f

No

390

45.1 (41.8 - 48.4)

caregiver_unengaged_f

No caregiver present

468

54.1 (50.8 - 57.4)

caregiver_unengaged_f

Unable to assess

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

caregiver_unengaged_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

caretaker_withdrawn_care_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Abandonment Indicators: Evidence that a caretaker has withdrawn care precipitously without alternate arrangements. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

caretaker_withdrawn_care_f

No evidence

177

95.2 (90.9 - 97.5)

caretaker_withdrawn_care_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

caretaker_withdrawn_care_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

caretaker_withdrawn_care_f

Definite evidence

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.8)

caretaker_withdrawn_care_f

Unable to assess

8

4.3 (2.2 - 8.4)

clothes_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale General Assessment: Clothes. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

clothes_5cat_f

0 - Clean/neat

127

61.7 (54.8 - 68.1)

clothes_5cat_f

1

62

30.1 (24.2 - 36.8)

clothes_5cat_f

2

14

6.8 (4.0 - 11.2)

clothes_5cat_f

3

3

1.5 (0.5 - 4.5)

clothes_5cat_f

4 - Very soiled

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

clutter_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Clutter. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

clutter_5cat_f

0 - Neat/orderly

117

61.3 (54.1 - 68.0)

clutter_5cat_f

1

39

20.4 (15.2 - 26.8)

clutter_5cat_f

2

22

11.5 (7.7 - 16.9)

clutter_5cat_f

3

10

5.2 (2.8 - 9.5)

clutter_5cat_f

4 - Very cluttered/difficult to move around or find things

3

1.6 (0.5 - 4.8)

contracture_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Contractures. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

contracture_f

No evidence

201

98.5 (95.5 - 99.5)

contracture_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

contracture_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

contracture_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

contracture_f

Unable to assess

3

1.5 (0.5 - 4.5)

decubitus_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Decubitii (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

decubitus_f

No evidence

167

82.3 (76.3 - 87.0)

decubitus_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

decubitus_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

decubitus_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

decubitus_f

Unable to assess

36

17.7 (13.0 - 23.7)

dehydration_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Dehydration. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

dehydration_f

No evidence

196

95.6 (91.7 - 97.7)

dehydration_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

dehydration_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

dehydration_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

dehydration_f

Unable to assess

9

4.4 (2.3 - 8.3)

depressed_f

Detection of Elder abuse Through Emergency Care Technicians (DETECT) Screening Items: Does the older adult appear depressed, anxious, or emotionally distressed for reasons other than their immediate medical condition?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

depressed_f

Yes

23

2.7 (1.8 - 4.0)

depressed_f

No

810

94.1 (92.3 - 95.5)

depressed_f

No caregiver present

26

3.0 (2.1 - 4.4)

depressed_f

Unable to assess

2

0.2 (0.1 - 0.9)

depressed_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

depression_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Depression. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

depression_f

No evidence

175

91.1 (86.2 - 94.4)

depression_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

depression_f

Probable evidence

10

5.2 (2.8 - 9.5)

depression_f

Definite evidence

3

1.6 (0.5 - 4.8)

depression_f

Unable to assess

4

2.1 (0.8 - 5.5)

diarrhea_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Diarrhea. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

diarrhea_f

No evidence

176

86.3 (80.8 - 90.4)

diarrhea_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

diarrhea_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

diarrhea_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

diarrhea_f

Unable to assess

28

13.7 (9.6 - 19.2)

difficulty_medications_f

Detection of Elder abuse Through Emergency Care Technicians (DETECT) Screening Items: Does the older adult have difficulties taking their prescribed medications as directed?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

difficulty_medications_f

Yes

6

0.7 (0.3 - 1.6)

difficulty_medications_f

No

733

85.6 (83.1 - 87.8)

difficulty_medications_f

No caregiver present

22

2.6 (1.7 - 3.9)

difficulty_medications_f

Unable to assess

95

11.1 (9.2 - 13.4)

difficulty_medications_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

disarray_hoarding_f

Detection of Elder abuse Through Emergency Care Technicians (DETECT) Screening Items: Inside of home is in extreme disarray/hoarding.

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

disarray_hoarding_f

Yes

39

4.6 (3.4 - 6.2)

disarray_hoarding_f

No

799

93.9 (92.1 - 95.3)

disarray_hoarding_f

No caregiver present

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

disarray_hoarding_f

Unable to assess

13

1.5 (0.9 - 2.6)

disarray_hoarding_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

evidence_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Exploitation Indicators: Evidence. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

evidence_f

No evidence

169

82.8 (77.0 - 87.5)

evidence_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

evidence_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

evidence_f

Definite evidence

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.4)

evidence_f

Unable to assess

34

16.7 (12.1 - 22.5)

exploitation_statement_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Exploitation Indicators: Statement by older adult related to exploitation. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

exploitation_statement_f

No evidence

202

99.0 (96.1 - 99.8)

exploitation_statement_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

exploitation_statement_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

exploitation_statement_f

Definite evidence

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.4)

exploitation_statement_f

Unable to assess

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.4)

exterior_condition_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Exterior condition. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

exterior_condition_5cat_f

0 - Neat/well kept/no trash, debris

136

71.6 (64.7 - 77.6)

exterior_condition_5cat_f

1

32

16.8 (12.1 - 22.9)

exterior_condition_5cat_f

2

10

5.3 (2.8 - 9.6)

exterior_condition_5cat_f

3

10

5.3 (2.8 - 9.6)

exterior_condition_5cat_f

4 - Poorly maintained/trash, other debris

2

1.1 (0.3 - 4.2)

fractures_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Abuse Indicators: Fractures. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

fractures_f

No evidence

200

96.6 (93.0 - 98.4)

fractures_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

fractures_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

fractures_f

Definite evidence

3

1.4 (0.5 - 4.4)

fractures_f

Unable to assess

4

1.9 (0.7 - 5.1)

goods_for_services_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Exploitation Indicators: Reports of demands for goods in exchange for service. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

goods_for_services_f

No evidence

199

98.5 (95.5 - 99.5)

goods_for_services_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

goods_for_services_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

goods_for_services_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

goods_for_services_f

Unable to assess

3

1.5 (0.5 - 4.5)

hair_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale General Assessment: Hair. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

hair_5cat_f

0 - Clean/combed

130

63.1 (56.3 - 69.5)

hair_5cat_f

1

65

31.6 (25.5 - 38.3)

hair_5cat_f

2

9

4.4 (2.3 - 8.2)

hair_5cat_f

3

2

1.0 (0.2 - 3.8)

hair_5cat_f

4 - Matted/dirty

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

health_safety_concern_f

Detection of Elder abuse Through Emergency Care Technicians (DETECT) Screening Items: Living environment poses a health or safety concern (e.g., fire hazard, insect or rodent infestation, urine or feces present).

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

health_safety_concern_f

Yes

23

2.7 (1.8 - 4.0)

health_safety_concern_f

No

811

93.6 (91.8 - 95.1)

health_safety_concern_f

No caregiver present

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

health_safety_concern_f

Unable to assess

32

3.7 (2.6 - 5.2)

health_safety_concern_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

hoarding_medications_f

Detection of Elder abuse Through Emergency Care Technicians (DETECT) Screening Items: Does the older adult appear to be hoarding/saving old medications?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

hoarding_medications_f

Yes

7

0.8 (0.4 - 1.7)

hoarding_medications_f

No

705

82.4 (79.7 - 84.8)

hoarding_medications_f

No caregiver present

21

2.5 (1.6 - 3.7)

hoarding_medications_f

Unable to assess

123

14.4 (12.2 - 16.9)

hoarding_medications_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

hygiene_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Hygiene. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

hygiene_f

Very good

106

51.2 (44.4 - 58.0)

hygiene_f

Good

92

44.4 (37.8 - 51.3)

hygiene_f

Poor

8

3.9 (1.9 - 7.6)

hygiene_f

Very poor

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.4)

hygiene_f

Unable to assess

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

impaction_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Impaction. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

impaction_f

No evidence

163

80.7 (74.6 - 85.6)

impaction_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

impaction_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

impaction_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

impaction_f

Unable to assess

39

19.3 (14.4 - 25.4)

inability_account_money_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Exploitation Indicators: Inability to account for money/property. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

inability_account_money_f

No evidence

201

98.5 (95.5 - 99.5)

inability_account_money_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

inability_account_money_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

inability_account_money_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

inability_account_money_f

Unable to assess

3

1.5 (0.5 - 4.5)

inadequately_clothed_f

Detection of Elder abuse Through Emergency Care Technicians (DETECT) Screening Items: Is the older adult inadequately clothed or wearing dirty, torn, or soiled clothing?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

inadequately_clothed_f

Yes

17

2.0 (1.2 - 3.2)

inadequately_clothed_f

No

814

95.0 (93.3 - 96.3)

inadequately_clothed_f

No caregiver present

23

2.7 (1.8 - 4.0)

inadequately_clothed_f

Unable to assess

3

0.4 (0.1 - 1.1)

inadequately_clothed_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

inappropriate_medication_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Inappropirate medications (over/under). (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

inappropriate_medication_f

No evidence

167

81.1 (75.1 - 85.9)

inappropriate_medication_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

inappropriate_medication_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

inappropriate_medication_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

inappropriate_medication_f

Unable to assess

39

18.9 (14.1 - 24.9)

interior_condition_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Interior condition. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

interior_condition_5cat_f

0 - Intact/not broken or missing

136

74.3 (67.4 - 80.2)

interior_condition_5cat_f

1

26

14.2 (9.8 - 20.1)

interior_condition_5cat_f

2

14

7.7 (4.6 - 12.6)

interior_condition_5cat_f

3

7

3.8 (1.8 - 7.9)

interior_condition_5cat_f

4 - Multiple sections broken/missing

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

isolated_home_f

Detection of Elder abuse Through Emergency Care Technicians (DETECT) Screening Items: Is the older adult isolated in the home and/or cut-off from needed social networks or supports?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

isolated_home_f

Yes

20

2.3 (1.5 - 3.6)

isolated_home_f

No

801

93.1 (91.2 - 94.7)

isolated_home_f

No caregiver present

32

3.7 (2.6 - 5.2)

isolated_home_f

Unable to assess

7

0.8 (0.4 - 1.7)

isolated_home_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

kitchen_cleanliness_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Cleanliness - Kitchen. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

kitchen_cleanliness_5cat_f

0 - Clean, no evidence of unsanitary conditions

138

71.5 (64.7 - 77.5)

kitchen_cleanliness_5cat_f

1

33

17.1 (12.4 - 23.1)

kitchen_cleanliness_5cat_f

2

12

6.2 (3.5 - 10.7)

kitchen_cleanliness_5cat_f

3

7

3.6 (1.7 - 7.5)

kitchen_cleanliness_5cat_f

4 - Very dirty, unwashed dishes, trash litter

3

1.6 (0.5 - 4.8)

lacerations_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Abuse Indicators: Lacerations. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

lacerations_f

No evidence

204

99.0 (96.2 - 99.8)

lacerations_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

lacerations_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

lacerations_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

lacerations_f

Unable to assess

2

1.0 (0.2 - 3.8)

left_alone_unsafe_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Abandonment Indicators: Evidence that older adult is left alone in an unsafe environment for extended periods of time without adequate support. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

left_alone_unsafe_f

No evidence

186

97.9 (94.5 - 99.2)

left_alone_unsafe_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

left_alone_unsafe_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

left_alone_unsafe_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

left_alone_unsafe_f

Unable to assess

4

2.1 (0.8 - 5.5)

living_room_cleanliness_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Cleanliness - Living room. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

living_room_cleanliness_5cat_f

0 - Clean, no evidence of unsanitary conditions

132

69.5 (62.5 - 75.7)

living_room_cleanliness_5cat_f

1

33

17.4 (12.6 - 23.5)

living_room_cleanliness_5cat_f

2

15

7.9 (4.8 - 12.7)

living_room_cleanliness_5cat_f

3

7

3.7 (1.8 - 7.6)

living_room_cleanliness_5cat_f

4 - Very dirty, unwashed dishes, trash litter

3

1.6 (0.5 - 4.8)

malnutrition_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Malnutrition. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

malnutrition_f

No evidence

199

98.0 (94.8 - 99.3)

malnutrition_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

malnutrition_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

malnutrition_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

malnutrition_f

Unable to assess

4

2.0 (0.7 - 5.2)

money_misuse_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Exploitation Indicators: Misuse of money. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

money_misuse_f

No evidence

196

97.5 (94.1 - 99.0)

money_misuse_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

money_misuse_f

Probable evidence

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.5)

money_misuse_f

Definite evidence

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.5)

money_misuse_f

Unable to assess

3

1.5 (0.5 - 4.6)

nails_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale General Assessment: Nails. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

nails_5cat_f

0 - Clean/trimmed

124

60.5 (53.6 - 67.0)

nails_5cat_f

1

70

34.1 (27.9 - 41.0)

nails_5cat_f

2

8

3.9 (2.0 - 7.6)

nails_5cat_f

3

2

1.0 (0.2 - 3.9)

nails_5cat_f

4 - Long/untrimmed/dirty

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.4)

neglect_statement_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Statement by older adult related to neglect. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

neglect_statement_f

No evidence

195

95.6 (91.7 - 97.7)

neglect_statement_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

neglect_statement_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

neglect_statement_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

neglect_statement_f

Unable to assess

9

4.4 (2.3 - 8.3)

nutrition_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Nutrition. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

nutrition_f

Very good

104

50.5 (43.6 - 57.3)

nutrition_f

Good

96

46.6 (39.8 - 53.5)

nutrition_f

Poor

5

2.4 (1.0 - 5.7)

nutrition_f

Very poor

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

nutrition_f

Unable to assess

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.4)

obvious_disease_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Failure to respond to warning of obvious disease. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

obvious_disease_f

No evidence

196

96.6 (92.9 - 98.4)

obvious_disease_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

obvious_disease_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

obvious_disease_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

obvious_disease_f

Unable to assess

7

3.4 (1.6 - 7.1)

odor_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Odor. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

odor_5cat_f

0 - Normal household odor

150

77.7 (71.2 - 83.1)

odor_5cat_f

1

29

15.0 (10.6 - 20.8)

odor_5cat_f

2

6

3.1 (1.4 - 6.8)

odor_5cat_f

3

5

2.6 (1.1 - 6.1)

odor_5cat_f

4 - Pungent, unpleasant odor (may be human/animal waste, rotting food)

3

1.6 (0.5 - 4.8)

pets_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Pets. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

pets_5cat_f

0 - All animals cared for

168

96.0 (91.8 - 98.1)

pets_5cat_f

1 or 2 - Uncared animals

6

3.4 (1.5 - 7.5)

pets_5cat_f

3 or 4 - Uncared animals

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

pets_5cat_f

5 or 6 - Uncared animals

1

0.6 (0.1 - 4.0)

pets_5cat_f

6 or more - Uncared animals

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

poor_hygiene_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Poor hygiene. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

poor_hygiene_f

No evidence

198

98.5 (95.4 - 99.5)

poor_hygiene_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

poor_hygiene_f

Probable evidence

2

1.0 (0.2 - 3.9)

poor_hygiene_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

poor_hygiene_f

Unable to assess

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.5)

poor_personal_hygiene_f

Detection of Elder abuse Through Emergency Care Technicians (DETECT) Screening Items: Does the older adult have poor personal hygiene (including soiled in urine or feces)?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

poor_personal_hygiene_f

Yes

9

1.0 (0.5 - 2.0)

poor_personal_hygiene_f

No

824

96.0 (94.5 - 97.2)

poor_personal_hygiene_f

No caregiver present

23

2.7 (1.8 - 4.0)

poor_personal_hygiene_f

Unable to assess

2

0.2 (0.1 - 0.9)

poor_personal_hygiene_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

repetitive_hosp_admission_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Repetitive hospital admissions due to probable failure of health care surveillance. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

repetitive_hosp_admission_f

No evidence

180

87.0 (81.6 - 90.9)

repetitive_hosp_admission_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

repetitive_hosp_admission_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

repetitive_hosp_admission_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

repetitive_hosp_admission_f

Unable to assess

27

13.0 (9.1 - 18.4)

report_elder_abuse_f

Did you report elder abuse/neglect to APS, or, do you plan to based on what you just observed?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

report_elder_abuse_f

Yes

13

1.5 (0.9 - 2.6)

report_elder_abuse_f

No

823

96.0 (94.5 - 97.2)

report_elder_abuse_f

No caregiver present

19

2.2 (1.4 - 3.5)

report_elder_abuse_f

Unable to assess

2

0.2 (0.1 - 0.9)

report_elder_abuse_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

roof_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Roof. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

roof_5cat_f

0 - Intact/no structural damage

139

77.2 (70.5 - 82.8)

roof_5cat_f

1

25

13.9 (9.5 - 19.8)

roof_5cat_f

2

9

5.0 (2.6 - 9.4)

roof_5cat_f

3

6

3.3 (1.5 - 7.3)

roof_5cat_f

4 - Dilapidated/poorly maintained, holes

1

0.6 (0.1 - 3.9)

sexual_abuse_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Abuse Indicators: Evidence of sexual abuse. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

sexual_abuse_f

No evidence

182

88.8 (83.6 - 92.5)

sexual_abuse_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

sexual_abuse_f

Probable evidence

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.4)

sexual_abuse_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

sexual_abuse_f

Unable to assess

22

10.7 (7.1 - 15.8)

skin_integrity_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Skin integrity. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

skin_integrity_f

Very good

104

50.7 (43.9 - 57.6)

skin_integrity_f

Good

98

47.8 (41.0 - 54.7)

skin_integrity_f

Poor

3

1.5 (0.5 - 4.5)

skin_integrity_f

Very poor

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

skin_integrity_f

Unable to assess

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

stages_healing_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Abuse Indicators: Various stages of healing of any bruises or fractures/ (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

stages_healing_f

No evidence

201

97.1 (93.7 - 98.7)

stages_healing_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

stages_healing_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

stages_healing_f

Definite evidence

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.4)

stages_healing_f

Unable to assess

5

2.4 (1.0 - 5.7)

structural_problems_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Structural problems. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

structural_problems_5cat_f

0 - No structural problems

144

84.2 (77.9 - 89.0)

structural_problems_5cat_f

1

20

11.7 (7.6 - 17.5)

structural_problems_5cat_f

2

2

1.2 (0.3 - 4.6)

structural_problems_5cat_f

3

5

2.9 (1.2 - 6.9)

structural_problems_5cat_f

4 - Severe structural damage (e.g., holes in sheetrock, floor leaking, ceiling

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

summary_evidence_abandonment_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Summary - Evidence of abandonment. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

summary_evidence_abandonment_f

No evidence

198

100.0 (NaN - NaN)

summary_evidence_abandonment_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

summary_evidence_abandonment_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

summary_evidence_abandonment_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

summary_evidence_abandonment_f

Unable to assess

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

summary_evidence_abuse_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Summary - Evidence of abuse. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

summary_evidence_abuse_f

No evidence

194

98.5 (95.3 - 99.5)

summary_evidence_abuse_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

summary_evidence_abuse_f

Probable evidence

2

1.0 (0.3 - 4.0)

summary_evidence_abuse_f

Definite evidence

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.6)

summary_evidence_abuse_f

Unable to assess

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

summary_evidence_exploitation_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Summary - Evidence of exploitation. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

summary_evidence_exploitation_f

No evidence

194

99.5 (96.4 - 99.9)

summary_evidence_exploitation_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

summary_evidence_exploitation_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

summary_evidence_exploitation_f

Definite evidence

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.6)

summary_evidence_exploitation_f

Unable to assess

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

summary_evidence_neglect_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Summary - Evidence of neglect. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

summary_evidence_neglect_f

No evidence

194

99.5 (96.4 - 99.9)

summary_evidence_neglect_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

summary_evidence_neglect_f

Probable evidence

1

0.5 (0.1 - 3.6)

summary_evidence_neglect_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

summary_evidence_neglect_f

Unable to assess

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

unmet_needs_f

Detection of Elder abuse Through Emergency Care Technicians (DETECT) Screening Items: Is/Does the patient/older adult have unmet needs for assistance with eating, toileting, transferring, dressing, or bathing?

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

unmet_needs_f

Yes

10

1.2 (0.6 - 2.2)

unmet_needs_f

No

819

95.6 (94.0 - 96.8)

unmet_needs_f

No caregiver present

20

2.3 (1.5 - 3.6)

unmet_needs_f

Unable to assess

8

0.9 (0.5 - 1.9)

unmet_needs_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

unusual_odor_f

Detection of Elder abuse Through Emergency Care Technicians (DETECT) Screening Items: Unusual odors (e.g. urine, feces) that are unrelated to current medical conditions and/or are more extreme than expected given current medical conditions.

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

unusual_odor_f

Yes

15

1.7 (1.1 - 2.9)

unusual_odor_f

No

840

97.6 (96.3 - 98.4)

unusual_odor_f

No caregiver present

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

unusual_odor_f

Unable to assess

6

0.7 (0.3 - 1.5)

unusual_odor_f

Did not enter patient’s home

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

urine_burn_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Urine burns. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

urine_burn_f

No evidence

161

78.5 (72.3 - 83.7)

urine_burn_f

Possible Evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

urine_burn_f

Probable evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

urine_burn_f

Definite evidence

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

urine_burn_f

Unable to assess

44

21.5 (16.3 - 27.7)

utilities_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Utilities. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

utilities_5cat_f

0 - All utilities work

170

97.1 (93.3 - 98.8)

utilities_5cat_f

1 - No phone

4

2.3 (0.9 - 6.0)

utilities_5cat_f

2 - No gas/electricity

1

0.6 (0.1 - 4.0)

utilities_5cat_f

3 - No water

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

utilities_5cat_f

4 - Multiple utilities do not work

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

walls_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Walls (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

walls_5cat_f

0 - Intact/no structural damage

141

77.9 (71.2 - 83.4)

walls_5cat_f

1

28

15.5 (10.9 - 21.6)

walls_5cat_f

2

8

4.4 (2.2 - 8.6)

walls_5cat_f

3

4

2.2 (0.8 - 5.8)

walls_5cat_f

4 - Dilapidated/poorly maintained, holes

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

windows_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Windows. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

windows_5cat_f

0 - Intact/not broken or missing

141

79.2 (72.6 - 84.6)

windows_5cat_f

1

26

14.6 (10.1 - 20.7)

windows_5cat_f

2

6

3.4 (1.5 - 7.4)

windows_5cat_f

3

5

2.8 (1.2 - 6.6)

windows_5cat_f

4 - Multiple sections broken/missing

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

yard_sidewalk_5cat_f

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Environment status of subject: Yard/Sidewalk. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 08/25/2020.)

Variable

Category

N

Percent of N (95% CI)

yard_sidewalk_5cat_f

0 - Neat/well kept/no trash, debris

134

71.7 (64.7 - 77.7)

yard_sidewalk_5cat_f

1

34

18.2 (13.2 - 24.4)

yard_sidewalk_5cat_f

2

9

4.8 (2.5 - 9.0)

yard_sidewalk_5cat_f

3

10

5.3 (2.9 - 9.7)

yard_sidewalk_5cat_f

4 - Poorly maintained/trash, debris

0

0.0 (NaN - NaN)

Free Text Variables

These variables contain free text response data that is not analyzed on this site.

Variable

Description

neglect_comments

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Neglect Indicators: Additional comments. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 9/24/2020.)

exploitation_comments

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Exploitation Indicators: Additional comments. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 9/24/2020.)

abandonment_comments

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale Possible Abandonment Indicators: Additional comments. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 9/24/2020.)

summary_comments

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale - Environment status of subject: Summary - Additional comments. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 9/24/2020.)

general_assessment_comments

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale - General Assessment: Additional comments. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 9/24/2020.)

abuse_indicators_comments

Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) / Self-neglect Severity Scale - Possible Abuse Indicators: Additional comments. (Question used in older version of the follow-up interview until 9/24/2020.)

at_phys_why

AT_1a. Why do you believe physical abuse has or has not occurred?

at_sex_why

AT_2a. Why do you believe sexual abuse has or has not occurred?

at_emot_why

AT_3a. Why do you believe emotional or psychological abuse has or has not occurred?

at_neg_why

AT_4a. Why do you believe neglect has or has not occurred?

at_aban_why

AT_5a. Why do you believe abandonment has or has not occurred?

at_fina_why

AT_6a. Why do you believe financial or material exploitation has or hasn’t occurred?

at_self_why

AT_7a. Why do you believe self-neglect has or has not occurred?

Download Tables in Word File